Parent Directory | Revision Log
|Links to HEAD:||(view) (download) (annotate)|
Remove reference to the obsolete, too old libpkg-guide
buildd.d.o prefers https these days. Thanks to taffit.
Slimmed P&P1 only a bit. I'm a coward.
Steer the bad licenses question towards the main point
Fixed url (thanks Raphael Geissert)
Resurrect the package descriptions guide from web.archive.org on wiki.debian.org. Closes: #512941
move debtags to ts1, and reword PH1 so that it replaces PH5, removing confusion over the term "sections" in the archive. (Closes: #473923).
Integrated some suggestions from diction(1)
Less apologetic and slightly more neutral language
- template improvements from Olly Betts.
Replacing igloo by luk's new page.
make PH6 more verbose
too many people don't realize there is a question right before PH1. Label it PH0 to make it more obvious.
Updating debtags question as suggested by enrico.
Better PH5 question.
Adding two more questions for pp1.
Replace some occurrences of "section" with "component" and other appropriate terms.
Add a patch submitted by Lucas.
move nm-templates in place after import from cvs
* Some changes suggested by Thijs Kinkhorst, mostly URL updates. (Closes: #473926)
* s/want/need/, we dont only want the signature, we need it. * s/libc6/libc/ - there is more than libc6, this is not specific for this one binary package.
update introductions and some misc fixes
First revision of a reworked set of templates. Merged, moved and restructured a lot of questions. 99% of this work was done by Myon, thanks!
add a note about quoting
The FDL discussion is over, thanks Anthony DeRobertis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
requirements of the different sections, reformulate dfsg tests
Minor whitespace fixes
Move DFSG FAQ link from pp2 to pp1.
A patch from Christoph Berg
Dropped pine, modified the main/contrib/non-free question.
Added a mail to the advocate/sponsor of the applicant to get some more informations. Maybe this should be integrated into the automatic advocate mails. Modified assigned.txt: - Mention that it is good to have more sigs than just the one absolutely needed for the ID check - Changed the stuff about the package, its more detailed in 2. step of T&S now. - added a paragraph that one can ask if there are problems with questions. Splitted the templates for P&P and T&S: - Now there are two files with questions for both parts. They should all be used IMO, as they are splitted (and a bit rewritten) but still the same. The first P&P now checks the absolutely important things like SC/DFSG (Philosophy), the second part the Procedures stuff. T&S isnt so easy to split, it is now a 3 step thing. First two sets of questions and small tasks, then a thorough package check. With the first T&S mail there is now the mention of dak.ganneff.de and the account. AMs should simply mail the keyid of the applicant to email@example.com to give the NM an account there.
This form allows you to request diffs between any two revisions of this file. For each of the two "sides" of the diff, enter a numeric revision.
|Powered by ViewVC 1.1.5|