/[kernel-sec]/retired/CVE-2004-0587
ViewVC logotype

Diff of /retired/CVE-2004-0587

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log | View Patch Patch

people/horms/patch_notes/cve/00boilerplate revision 16 by dannf, Wed Oct 19 18:02:33 2005 UTC patch-tracking/CVE-2004-0587 revision 167 by dannf, Sun Dec 18 23:10:23 2005 UTC
# Line 1  Line 1 
1  A boilerplate for tracking the status of patches across Debian Kernel trees.  Candidate: CVE-2004-0587
2  dannf> should anything go above this line?  References:
3  dannf> should we use debian-style rfc822 for this for machine readability?   FEDORA:FEDORA-2004-186
4  ======================================================   URL:http://lwn.net/Articles/91155/
5  Candidate: (##NEEDED## | CAN-XXXX-XXXX | N/A)   MANDRAKE:MDKSA-2004:066
6  URL: dannf> What makes a URL different than a Reference?  Is it always mitre's?   URL:http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2004:066
7  Reference: CONFIRM:##URL## dannf> what does CONFIRM mean?   REDHAT:RHSA-2004:413
8  Reference: MISC:##URL## dannf> what does MISC mean?   URL:http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-413.html
9     REDHAT:RHSA-2004:418
10  Description: ##NEEDED## dannf> can a single description work for the cve,   URL:http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-418.html
11                          dannf> the changelog, and the DSA?   SGI:20040804-01-U
12                          dannf> should this use debian/control style multiline?   URL:ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20040804-01-U.asc
13                          dannf> should we have a short description?   SUSE:SuSE-SA:2004:010
14  upstream: comma separated versions(s) of upstream kernel that first included this patch   URL:http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2004_10_kernel.html
15  2.6.13: (pending|released|already included|N/A)(backported)?(patch-name-used.diff)?   BID:10279
16  2.6.12: (added to svn|released)(backported)?(patch-name-used.diff)?   URL:http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10279
17  2.6.8-sarge: (added to svn|released)(backported)?(patch-name-used.diff)?   SECTRACK:1010057
18  ...   URL:http://securitytracker.com/id?1010057
19  one line for each currently maintained tree   XF:suse-hbaapinode-dos(16062)
20     URL:http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/16062
21  dannf> what does backported mean?  the patch didn't apply & needed munging,  Description:
22  dannf> or just that we used a patch intended for a newer tree, that may have   Insecure permissions for the /proc/scsi/qla2300/HbaApiNode file in Linux
23  dannf> applied cleanly?   allows local users to cause a denial of service.
24    Notes:
25     2.4.26-3 has the note:
26      CVE-2004-0587 code is not present, not vulnerable
27     So the question is, did the code get added when we moved to 2.4.27, and
28     was it still vulnerable?
29    Bugs:
30    upstream:
31    2.6.14:
32    2.6.8-sarge-security:
33    2.4.27-sarge-security:
34    2.6.8:
35    2.4.19-woody-security:
36    2.4.18-woody-security:
37    2.4.17-woody-security:
38    2.4.16-woody-security:
39    2.4.17-woody-security-hppa:
40    2.4.17-woody-security-ia64:
41    2.4.18-woody-security-hppa:
Legend:
Removed from v.16  
changed lines
  Added in v.167
  ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.5